Topical therapy is underused in patients with ulcerative colitis.

TitleTopical therapy is underused in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsSeibold, F, Fournier, N, Beglinger, C, Mottet, C, Pittet, V, Rogler, G
Corporate AuthorsGroup, SIBDCohort
JournalJournal of Crohn's and Colitis
Volume8
Issue1
Pagination56-63
Date Published01/2014
DOI10.1016/j.crohns.2013.03.005
ISSN1873-9946
ISBN Number1876-4479 (Electronic)
KeywordsAdministration, Oral, Administration, Rectal, Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adrenal Cortex Hormones, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Budesonide, Colitis, Ulcerative, Enema, Female, Humans, Immunologic Factors, Male, Mesalamine, Middle Aged, Proctitis, Severity of Illness Index, Switzerland, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Young Adult
Abstract

The availability of new topical preparations for the treatment of left sided ulcerative colitis offers a therapy optimization for many patients. Rectal application of steroids and 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) is associated with fewer side effects and has a higher therapeutic efficacy in left-sided colitis as compared to a systemic therapy. Therefore, we were interested in the use of topical therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis. The key question was whether topical treatment is more frequently used than oral therapy in patients with proctitis and left sided colitis. Data of 800 patients of the Swiss IBD cohort study were analyzed. Sixteen percent of patients of the cohort had proctitis, 21% proctosigmoiditis and 41% pancolitis. Topical therapy with 5-ASA or corticosteroids was given in 26% of patients with proctitis, a combined systemic and topical treatment was given in 13%, whereas systemic treatment with 5-ASA without topical treatment was given in 29%. Proportion of topical drug use decreased with respect to disease extension from 39% for proctitis to 13.1% for pancolitis (P=0.001). Patients with severe colitis received a significantly higher dose of topical 5-ASA than patients in remission. Side effects of topical or systemic 5-ASA or budesonide treatment were less frequently seen compared to other medications. Topical treatment was frequently stopped over time. The quality of life was the same in patients with limited disease compared to patients with pancolitis. Topical treatment in proctitis patients was underused in Switzerland. Since topical treatment is safe and effective it should be used to a larger extend.

Notes

Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Publication Status: ppublish

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23566922?dopt=Abstract

First publication date (online)

04/2013

WOS ID (UT)

000329951000006

Alternate JournalJ Crohns Colitis
Citation Key / SERVAL ID3413
Peer reviewRefereed
PubMed ID23566922
Thème IUMSP et mots clés: 

                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top