Key elements for, and indicators of, a successful transition: an international Delphi study.

TitleKey elements for, and indicators of, a successful transition: an international Delphi study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsSurís, J-C, Akré, C
JournalJournal of Adolescent Health
Volume56
Issue6
Pagination612-618
Date Published06/2015
DOI10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.02.007
ISSN1879-1972
ISBN Number1879-1972 (Electronic)
KeywordsAdolescent, Adolescent Health, Adult, Chronic Disease, Consensus, Delphi Technique, Humans, Transition to Adult Care
Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to reach an international consensus to determine what key elements should be part of a transition program and what indicators could be used to assess its success.

METHODS: For this purpose, a Delphi study including an international panel of 37 experts was carried out. The study consisted of three rounds, with response rates ranging from 86.5% to 95%. At each round, experts were asked to assess key elements (defined as the most important elements for the task) and indicators (defined as quantifiable characteristics). At each round, panelists were contacted via e-mail explaining them the tasks to be done and giving them the Web link where to complete the questionnaire. At Round 3, each key element and indicator was assessed as essential, very important, important, accessory, or unnecessary. A 70% agreement was used as cutoff.

RESULTS: At Round 3, more than 70% of panelists agreed on six key elements being essential, with one of them (Assuring a good coordination between pediatric and adult professionals) reaching an almost complete consensus (97%). Additionally, 11 more obtained more than 70% agreement when combined with the Very important category. Among indicators, only one (Patient not lost to follow-up) was considered almost unanimously (91%) as essential by the panelists and seven others also reached consensus when the Very important category was included.

CONCLUSIONS: Using these results as a framework to develop guidelines at local, national, and international levels would allow better assessing and comparing transition programs.

Notes

Publication types: Journal ArticlePublication Status: ppublish

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26003575?dopt=Abstract

First publication date (online)

02/2015

WOS ID (UT)

000354867700007

Alternate JournalJ Adolesc Health
Citation Key / SERVAL ID6000
Peer reviewRefereed
PubMed ID26003575

                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top