Serum uric acid and adiposity: deciphering causality using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization approach.

TitreSerum uric acid and adiposity: deciphering causality using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization approach.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsLyngdoh, T, Vuistiner, P, Marques-Vidal, P, Rousson, V, Waeber, G, Vollenweider, P, Bochud, M
JournalPLoS One
Volume7
Issue6
Paginatione39321
Date Published2012
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0039321
ISSN1932-6203
Mots-clésAdiposity, Adult, Causality, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Genotype, Glucose Transport Proteins, Facilitative, Humans, Male, Membrane Proteins, Middle Aged, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Proteins, Random Allocation, Receptor, Melanocortin, Type 4, Uric Acid
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the relationship between serum uric acid (SUA) and adiposity is well established, the direction of the causality is still unclear in the presence of conflicting evidences. We used a bidirectional Mendelian randomization approach to explore the nature and direction of causality between SUA and adiposity in a population-based study of Caucasians aged 35 to 75 years.

METHODS AND FINDINGS: We used, as instrumental variables, rs6855911 within the SUA gene SLC2A9 in one direction, and combinations of SNPs within the adiposity genes FTO, MC4R and TMEM18 in the other direction. Adiposity markers included weight, body mass index, waist circumference and fat mass. We applied a two-stage least squares regression: a regression of SUA/adiposity markers on our instruments in the first stage and a regression of the response of interest on the fitted values from the first stage regression in the second stage. SUA explained by the SLC2A9 instrument was not associated to fat mass (regression coefficient [95% confidence interval]: 0.05 [-0.10, 0.19] for fat mass) contrasting with the ordinary least square estimate (0.37 [0.34, 0.40]). By contrast, fat mass explained by genetic variants of the FTO, MC4R and TMEM18 genes was positively and significantly associated to SUA (0.31 [0.01, 0.62]), similar to the ordinary least square estimate (0.27 [0.25, 0.29]). Results were similar for the other adiposity markers.

CONCLUSIONS: Using a bidirectional Mendelian randomization approach in adult Caucasians, our findings suggest that elevated SUA is a consequence rather than a cause of adiposity.

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22723994?dopt=Abstract

Alternate JournalPLoS ONE
Citation Key / SERVAL ID3262
PubMed ID22723994
PubMed Central IDPMC3378571
                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | iumsp@chuv.ch

Go to top