Feasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: Courriels Cochrane.

TitreFeasibility of a knowledge translation CME program: Courriels Cochrane.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2012
AuthorsPluye, P, Grad, R, Granikov, V, Theriault, G, Frémont, P, Burnand, B, Mercer, J, Marlow, B, Arroll, B, Luconi, F, Légaré, F, Labrecque, M, Ladouceur, R, Bouthillier, F, Sridhar, SBindiganav, Moscovici, J
JournalJ Contin Educ Health Prof
Date Published2012 Spring
Mots-clésAdult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cooperative Behavior, Education, Medical, Continuing, Educational Measurement, Electronic Mail, Evidence-Based Medicine, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Male, Middle Aged, Physicians, Problem-Based Learning, Quebec, Questionnaires, Review Literature as Topic

INTRODUCTION: Systematic literature reviews provide best evidence, but are underused by clinicians. Thus, integrating Cochrane reviews into continuing medical education (CME) is challenging. We designed a pilot CME program where summaries of Cochrane reviews (Courriels Cochrane) were disseminated by e-mail. Program participants automatically received CME credit for each Courriel Cochrane they rated. The feasibility of this program is reported (delivery, participation, and participant evaluation).

METHOD: We recruited French-speaking physicians through the Canadian Medical Association. Program delivery and participation were documented. Participants rated the informational value of Courriels Cochrane using the Information Assessment Method (IAM), which documented their reflective learning (relevance, cognitive impact, use for a patient, expected health benefits). IAM responses were aggregated and analyzed.

RESULTS: The program was delivered as planned. Thirty Courriels Cochrane were delivered to 985 physicians, and 127 (12.9%) completed at least one IAM questionnaire. Out of 1109 Courriels Cochrane ratings, 973 (87.7%) conta-ined 1 or more types of positive cognitive impact, while 835 (75.3%) were clinically relevant. Participants reported the use of information for a patient and expected health benefits in 595 (53.7%) and 569 (51.3%) ratings, respectively.

DISCUSSION: Program delivery required partnering with 5 organizations. Participants valued Courriels Cochrane. IAM ratings documented their reflective learning. The aggregation of IAM ratings documented 3 levels of CME outcomes: participation, learning, and performance. This evaluation study demonstrates the feasibility of the Courriels Cochrane as an approach to further disseminate Cochrane systematic literature reviews to clinicians and document self-reported knowledge translation associated with Cochrane reviews.

Alternate URL


Alternate JournalJ Contin Educ Health Prof
Citation Key / SERVAL ID3269
PubMed ID22733641
Grant List / / Canadian Institutes of Health Research / Canada


IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top