Sorting out measures and definitions of screening participation to improve comparability: the example of colorectal cancer.

TitreSorting out measures and definitions of screening participation to improve comparability: the example of colorectal cancer.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsBulliard, J-L, Garcia, M, Blom, J, Senore, C, Mai, V, Klabunde, C
JournalEur J Cancer
Volume50
Issue2
Pagination434-46
Date Published2014 Jan
DOI10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.015
ISSN1879-0852
ISBN Number1879-0852 (Electronic)
Mots-clésAdult, Aged, Benchmarking, Colorectal Neoplasms, Early Detection of Cancer, Europe, Guideline Adherence, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Practice Guidelines as Topic
Abstract

Participation is a key indicator of the potential effectiveness of any population-based intervention. Defining, measuring and reporting participation in cancer screening programmes has become more heterogeneous as the number and diversity of interventions have increased, and the purposes of this benchmarking parameter have broadened. This study, centred on colorectal cancer, addresses current issues that affect the increasingly complex task of comparing screening participation across settings. Reports from programmes with a defined target population and active invitation scheme, published between 2005 and 2012, were reviewed. Differences in defining and measuring participation were identified and quantified, and participation indicators were grouped by aims of measure and temporal dimensions. We found that consistent terminology, clear and complete reporting of participation definition and systematic documentation of coverage by invitation were lacking. Further, adherence to definitions proposed in the 2010 European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening was suboptimal. Ineligible individuals represented 1% to 15% of invitations, and variable criteria for ineligibility yielded differences in participation estimates that could obscure the interpretation of colorectal cancer screening participation internationally. Excluding ineligible individuals from the reference population enhances comparability of participation measures. Standardised measures of cumulative participation to compare screening protocols with different intervals and inclusion of time since invitation in definitions are urgently needed to improve international comparability of colorectal cancer screening participation. Recommendations to improve comparability of participation indicators in cancer screening interventions are made.

Notes

Publication types: Journal Article Publication Status: ppublish Document Type: Review

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24144735?dopt=Abstract

Alternate JournalEur. J. Cancer
Citation Key / SERVAL ID3499
PubMed ID24144735
Thème IUMSP et mots clés: 

                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top