Feasibility and clinical outcomes when using practice guidelines for evaluation of fever in returning travelers and migrants: a validation study.

TitreFeasibility and clinical outcomes when using practice guidelines for evaluation of fever in returning travelers and migrants: a validation study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsMueller, YK, D'Acremont, V, Ambresin, A-E, Rossi, I, Martin, O, Burnand, B, Genton, B
JournalJournal of Travel Medicine
Volume21
Issue3
Pagination169-82
Date Published05/2014
DOI10.1111/jtm.12099
ISSN1708-8305
ISBN Number1708-8305 (Electronic)
Mots-clésAdult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Directive Counseling, Dysentery, Female, Guideline Adherence, Humans, Male, Outcome Assessment (Health Care), Patient Care Planning, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Professional Practice, Quality Improvement, Switzerland, Transients and Migrants, Travel, Tropical Climate
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines for examining febrile patients presenting upon returning from the tropics were developed to assist primary care physicians in decision making. Because of the low level of evidence available in this field, there was a need to validate them and assess their feasibility in the context they have been designed for.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to (1) evaluate physicians' adherence to recommendations; (2) investigate reasons for non-adherence; and (3) ensure good clinical outcome of patients, the ultimate goal being to improve the quality of the guidelines, in particular to tailor them for the needs of the target audience and population.

METHODS: Physicians consulting the guidelines on the Internet (www.fevertravel.ch) were invited to participate in the study. Navigation through the decision chart was automatically recorded, including diagnostic tests performed, initial and final diagnoses, and clinical outcomes. The reasons for non-adherence were investigated and qualitative feedback was collected.

RESULTS: A total of 539 physician/patient pairs were included in this study. Full adherence to guidelines was observed in 29% of the cases. Figure-specific adherence rate was 54.8%. The main reasons for non-adherence were as follows: no repetition of malaria tests (111/352) and no presumptive antibiotic treatment for febrile diarrhea (64/153) or abdominal pain without leukocytosis (46/101). Overall, 20% of diversions from guidelines were considered reasonable because there was an alternative presumptive diagnosis or the symptoms were mild, which means that the corrected adherence rate per case was 40.6% and corrected adherence per figure was 61.7%. No death was recorded and all complications could be attributed to the underlying illness rather than to adherence to guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines proved to be feasible, useful, and leading to good clinical outcomes. Almost one third of physicians strictly adhered to the guidelines. Other physicians used the guidelines not to forget specific diagnoses but finally diverged from the proposed attitudes. These diversions should be scrutinized for further refinement of the guidelines to better fit to physician and patient needs.

Notes

Publication types: Journal Article ; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Publication Status: ppublish PDF : Original Article

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460885?dopt=Abstract

First publication date (online)

01/2014

WOS ID (UT)

000334445200006

Alternate JournalJ Travel Med
Citation Key / SERVAL ID3527
Peer reviewRefereed
PubMed ID24460885
Thème IUMSP et mots clés: 

                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top