Influence of arterial occlusion on outcome after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.

TitreInfluence of arterial occlusion on outcome after intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2015
AuthorsMedlin, F, Amiguet, M, Vanacker, P, Michel, P
JournalStroke
Volume46
Issue1
Pagination126-131
Date Published01/2015
DOI10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006408
ISSN1524-4628 (Electronic)
Mots-clésAged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiography, Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Brain Ischemia, Cerebral Angiography, Female, Fibrinolytic Agents, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Registries, Stroke, Thrombolytic Therapy, Tissue Plasminogen Activator, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the interaction between intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and arterial occlusion on acute cervicocerebral computed tomographic angiography on the outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS: Patients from the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL) registry with onset-to-door-time ≤4 hours, acute cervicocerebral computed tomographic angiography, a premorbid modified Rankin Scale ≤2, and a National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) >4 were selected. Patients with significant intracranial arterial obstruction (≥50%-99%) and undergoing acute endovascular treatment were excluded. An interaction analysis of IVT and initial arterial occlusion for favorable 3 months outcome (modified Rankin Scale <3) were performed with adjustment for potential confounders.

RESULTS: Among 654 included patients, 382 (58%) showed arterial occlusion, of whom 263 (69%) received IVT. Two hundred seventy-two showed no/minimal obstruction of whom 139 (51%) received IVT. In the adjusted interaction analysis, there was a trend in favor of the arterial occlusion group (odds ratio [OR]=3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-18.97; P=0.08). IVT (versus no IVT) was associated with better outcome in patients with occlusion (adjusted OR for favorable outcome, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.10-8.28) but not in patients with no/minimal obstruction (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.21-2.74). Conversely, patients with occlusion had a similar rate of favorable outcome as no/minimal obstruction when thrombolysed (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.17-1.47) but had a less favorable outcome without thrombolysis (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.04-0.44).

CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke, there was a trend for more favorable outcomes with IVT in the setting of initial arterial occlusion than in the setting of no/minimal obstruction. Before confirmation in randomized controlled studies, this information should not influence thrombolysis decisions, however.

Notes

IUMSP2015/01

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25424477?dopt=Abstract

First publication date (online)

11/2014

WOS ID (UT)

000346735800035

Alternate JournalStroke
Citation Key / SERVAL ID5795
Peer reviewRefereed
PubMed ID25424477
Thème IUMSP et mots clés: 

                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top