Efficacy of anthropometric measures for identifying cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents: review and meta-analysis.

TitreEfficacy of anthropometric measures for identifying cardiovascular disease risk in adolescents: review and meta-analysis.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsLichtenauer, M, Wheatley, SD, St James, MMartyn-, Duncan, MJ, Cobayashi, F, Berg, G, Musso, C, Graffigna, M, Soutelo, J, Bovet, P, Kollias, A, Stergiou, GS, Grammatikos, E, Griffiths, C, Ingle, L, Jung, C
JournalMinerva pediatrica
Volume70
Issue4
Pagination371-382
Date Published08/2018
DOI10.23736/S0026-4946.18.05175-7
ISSN1827-1715
Mots-clésAdolescent, Anthropometry/methods, Body Mass Index, Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology, Humans, Risk Factors, Waist Circumference/physiology, Waist-Height Ratio
Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare the ability of body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and waist to height ratio (WHtR) to estimate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk levels in adolescents.

METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed after a database search for relevant literature (Cochrane, Centre for Review and Dissemination, PubMed, British Nursing Index, CINAHL, BIOSIS citation index, ChildData, metaRegister).

RESULTS: 117 records representing 96 studies with 994,595 participants were included in the systematic review, 14 of which (13 studies, n=14,610) were eligible for the meta-analysis. The results of the meta-analysis showed that BMI was a strong indicator of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and insulin; but not total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein or glucose. Few studies were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis considering WC or WHtR (n≤2). The narrative synthesis found measures of central adiposity to be consistently valid indicators of the same risk factors as BMI.

CONCLUSIONS: BMI was an indicator of CVD risk. WC and WHtR were efficacious for indicating the same risk factors BMI performed strongly for, though there was insufficient evidence to judge the relative strength of each measure possibly due to heterogeneity in the methods for measuring and classifying WC.

Alternate URL

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29651834?dopt=Abstract

First publication date (online)

04/2018

WOS ID (UT)

000452520800008

Alternate JournalMinerva Pediatr.
Citation Key / SERVAL ID8812
Peer reviewRefereed
PubMed ID29651834

                         

IUMSP | www.iumsp.ch
Institut universitaire de médecine sociale et préventive
Route de la Corniche 10, 1010 Lausanne - Switzerland
+41 21 314 72 72 | dess.info@unisante.ch

Go to top